2.0
— 𝔻𝕒𝕨𝕟𝕋𝕁𝟡𝟘™ 🇵🇭💖🇨🇦 Climate of Dawn (@DawnTJ90) August 6, 2022
If energy from solar and wind were really and truly cheaper than oil and gas, there'd be no need to put a 'price on carbon' to try to level the playing field to make solar and wind more competitive with oil and gas.#ClimateScam #ClimateBrawl
cc: @GeraldKutney pic.twitter.com/5TY8QfIrQI
Showing posts with label energy. Show all posts
Showing posts with label energy. Show all posts
Saturday, August 6, 2022
Michael Mann Cult Leader Update 8-6-2022
Labels:
carbon,
Climate of Dawn,
DawnTJ90,
energy,
gas,
Michael Mann,
oil,
solar,
wind
Monday, May 23, 2022
Podcast: Brian Gitt Talks with Marty Bent
Listen to my conversation with @MartyBent.
— Brian Gitt (@BrianGitt) May 23, 2022
We discuss false beliefs about energy and why wind and solar power threaten human flourishing and our environment. https://t.co/4HInPIYPY5
Tuesday, March 16, 2021
Op-Ed: Humanity Survived Previous Warming Cycles
Interesting read.
"Yes, fossil fuels are probably a finite source. But as they become scarcer, their price will rise, and other sources of energy will become economically competitive. Innovation will lead to new energy technologies. Because everything humans due requires energy, energy demand WILL lead to an energy supply.
Interestingly, regarding energy literacy on renewables and fossil fuels, it is not that we are stupid, we are too emotional. One of the principles of branding is that people do not buy WHAT you do, they buy WHY you do it. We make most of our decisions based on feelings and emotions, NOT data and facts.
The WHY in this equation is simple, as it equates to getting off fossil fuels to reduce emissions at any cost. Emotions takes it from there, and any data or facts to the contrary are categorized as deniers to the emotional decisions in play. Elected and appointed officials, and special interest groups, feed off the WHY for government funding, to reduce emissions at any cost, for votes and money.
Nothing seems to have changed since Former President Eisenhower pointed out 60 years ago that scientists eager to keep the government funds flowing might take control of public policy to benefit their own careers."
"Yes, fossil fuels are probably a finite source. But as they become scarcer, their price will rise, and other sources of energy will become economically competitive. Innovation will lead to new energy technologies. Because everything humans due requires energy, energy demand WILL lead to an energy supply.
Interestingly, regarding energy literacy on renewables and fossil fuels, it is not that we are stupid, we are too emotional. One of the principles of branding is that people do not buy WHAT you do, they buy WHY you do it. We make most of our decisions based on feelings and emotions, NOT data and facts.
The WHY in this equation is simple, as it equates to getting off fossil fuels to reduce emissions at any cost. Emotions takes it from there, and any data or facts to the contrary are categorized as deniers to the emotional decisions in play. Elected and appointed officials, and special interest groups, feed off the WHY for government funding, to reduce emissions at any cost, for votes and money.
Nothing seems to have changed since Former President Eisenhower pointed out 60 years ago that scientists eager to keep the government funds flowing might take control of public policy to benefit their own careers."
Thursday, July 16, 2020
Podcast: Alex Epstein and Patrick Moore
It’s always a true pleasure to listen to two virtual mentors of mine, @EcoSenseNow and @AlexEpstein, whom I had the pleasure to meet in person, talk about climate change, energy, and human flourishing. A must watch for me, thoroughly enjoyable!https://t.co/4FT0DNTLap— Luca Bertagnolio (@lucaberta) July 16, 2020
Wednesday, March 7, 2018
Tesla - Musk Fraud Scam Update 3-7-18
Matt Canavan, Australia's minister for resources, is dismissive of the large Tesla battery in South Australia. "It's the Kim Kardashian of the energy world: it's famous for being famous. It really doesn't do very much." #CERAWeek2018— Ed Crooks (@Ed_Crooks) March 7, 2018
Sunday, December 24, 2017
Cartoon: Natures Little Trick
Natures little trick... pic.twitter.com/RuDrkIM5Ke— Climate Realists (@ClimateRealists) December 24, 2017
Thursday, November 16, 2017
Pielke Jr. in Today's Wall Street Journal
Roger Pielke, Jr., appears in today's Wall Street Journal:
A Litigious Climate Threatens Scientific Norms
An energy researcher sues another over a critical paper. It’s the wrong way to resolve such disputes.Tuesday, August 9, 2016
Fracking Explained In A Great Cartoon
@EthonRaptor exactly! So whats the point of adding to it? Try fracking, much better energy source @cathmckenna pic.twitter.com/wpx4y02HRy— Josh (@Cartoonsbyjosh) August 9, 2016
Thursday, July 5, 2012
Today's Read: Common Sense Environmental Policy
By Wesley Coopersmith
The importance of keeping our environment clean and safe is an issue agreed upon by most Americans. We want a clean environment that is not going to pose a threat for us or for future generations. The importance of not only a healthy environment, but a healthy economy is also shared amongst most if not all Americans. Both of these issues, the environment and the economy, need to be considered when evaluating EPA regulatory decisions. Despite the claims of the Obama administration that the EPA is taking common sense approaches to regulatory decisions, both their words and actions suggest otherwise.
The importance of keeping our environment clean and safe is an issue agreed upon by most Americans. We want a clean environment that is not going to pose a threat for us or for future generations. The importance of not only a healthy environment, but a healthy economy is also shared amongst most if not all Americans. Both of these issues, the environment and the economy, need to be considered when evaluating EPA regulatory decisions. Despite the claims of the Obama administration that the EPA is taking common sense approaches to regulatory decisions, both their words and actions suggest otherwise.
Read the rest of the column here.
Labels:
clean coal,
energy,
epa,
green conservatism,
green energy
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)