— 𝔻𝕒𝕨𝕟𝕋𝕁𝟡𝟘™ 🇵🇭💖🇨🇦 Climate of Dawn (@DawnTJ90) October 11, 2023
Who needs data, I have muh models! https://t.co/2OBDBh8Z2Y pic.twitter.com/HA2kfBx3Ml
— 𝔻𝕒𝕨𝕟𝕋𝕁𝟡𝟘™ 🇵🇭💖🇨🇦 Climate of Dawn (@DawnTJ90) October 11, 2023
— 𝔻𝕒𝕨𝕟𝕋𝕁𝟡𝟘™ 🇵🇭💖🇨🇦 Climate of Dawn (@DawnTJ90) October 11, 2023
Who needs data, I have muh models! https://t.co/2OBDBh8Z2Y pic.twitter.com/HA2kfBx3Ml
— 𝔻𝕒𝕨𝕟𝕋𝕁𝟡𝟘™ 🇵🇭💖🇨🇦 Climate of Dawn (@DawnTJ90) October 11, 2023
When they disagree with you, they don't use science or data. They will find a way to be at the top and fire you like the Chief alarmist did. Or sometimes sue you, like the legendary @MichaelEMann or the 🏒 deputy chief alarmist has done over the years.
— Jusper Machogu (@JusperMachogu) June 5, 2023
Humanity wins!#ClimateScam https://t.co/FTzhCgWRDJ pic.twitter.com/S7I4IHShRs
Michael Mann knows fudging data
— 𝔻𝕒𝕨𝕟𝕋𝕁𝟡𝟘™ 🇵🇭💖🇨🇦 Climate of Dawn (@DawnTJ90) April 21, 2023
He & his colleagues devised a plan [submitted abstract] to strengthen the pathetically weak hypothesis of man-made global warming
Lower the estimated temperatures - before temperature records existed.
Man-made global warming appears
Like… pic.twitter.com/5DF3nZiFJi
Michael Mann's lawyers agreed to pay court costs after his frivolous lawsuit against Tim Ball was dropped due to Mann's refusal to produce his data.
— Tony Heller (@TonyClimate) December 5, 2022
Mann never paid up because he is not only a dishonest scientist, but also a dishonest human.
The Ball family incurred well over a million dollars in legal costs because of Michael Mann's frivolous lawsuit. The judge ordered Mann to pay costs and Mann's lawyers agreed. But the most dishonest academic of our generation has never paid up. https://t.co/6UHT1TTRyn
— Tony Heller (@TonyClimate) December 6, 2022
Massive Mann BS: "“A decade ago or more, we sort of had to tease out of the data the impacts of climate change, you sort of…had to squint to see them in the data,” Mann said. “Today, you no longer have to do that. The impacts have become so profound""https://t.co/o5CGuz4OE5
— Tom Nelson (@tan123) September 9, 2021
The data doesn't support the left's climate apocalypse narrative. @thewillwitt pic.twitter.com/fKKLeiksz9
— PragerU (@prageru) October 12, 2020
GOTTA love #Climate bedwetters - whenever their orthodoxy is challenged by irrefutable facts & data they consult the groupthink playbook:— JWSpry (@JWSpry) October 22, 2017
1. “Unsourced”
2. “Not pal-reviewed”
3. “Not credible”
4. “Not established science”
5. “Denier”
6. “97%” or “99%” of scientists
I reckon you use your timeline as a rich source of data on #climatechange too, you warmist, ageist, sexist wally. https://t.co/sAD4w9EGbB— Jaime Jessop (@Balinteractive) August 11, 2017
"We don't need no stinkin' data" update: @ClimateOfGavin believes in Science! As sketched by @mtobis! pic.twitter.com/O2bCMPxC3m— Tom Nelson (@tan123) July 2, 2016