Climate scam promoter Mann: "we've got to cut our carbon emissions by 50% within this decade to avert catastrophic warming...the obstacles aren't technological at this point. They're entirely political. It's really that simple" https://t.co/ANQNLOLKWT
— Tom Nelson (@tan123) January 29, 2022
Showing posts with label carbon emissions. Show all posts
Showing posts with label carbon emissions. Show all posts
Saturday, January 29, 2022
Michael Mann Scam Update 1-29-2022
Wednesday, July 28, 2021
Michael Mann Disgrace Update 7-28-2021
Good luck with that: Climate scammer @MichaelEMann: "We have a decade within which we must halve global carbon emissions".
— Tom Nelson (@tan123) July 28, 2021
Mann insanely claims that emitting CO2 "leads to massive suffering and collapse of our civilizational infrastructure".
Sunday, October 14, 2018
Michael Mann Scam Update 10-14-18
-Climate scammer @MichaelEMann: "Human carbon emissions are entirely responsible for the warming of the planet during the industrial era, warming that made possible an unprecedented late season near cat 5 hurricane landfall on the panhandle of @marcorubio’s home state" pic.twitter.com/MiSNSkJANW— Tom Nelson (@tan123) October 15, 2018
Penn State admin cleared Michael Mann of wrongdoing regarding climate emails. Then again, the same admin cleared coach Jerry Sandusky of any wrongdoing regarding child abuse. Since both brought millions of dollars into the school could that have influenced their conclusions?— Mike McGeehan (@AManForOthers) October 14, 2018
Monday, November 27, 2017
Warmist Band Sounds Delusional in BBC Propaganda Interview
The false flag of so-called global warming led the BBC on their weekend show to interview members of a band called Moon Hooch. Hooch delusionally believes they offset their carbon emissions through a calculator and whatnot. It's an insane interview, but it barely lasts 6 minutes, so it won't consume much of your time. You are welcome.
As an aside, this interview was heard on NPR, and is a perfect example of why the federal government should not be funding public radio or any other media. Debate that.
As an aside, this interview was heard on NPR, and is a perfect example of why the federal government should not be funding public radio or any other media. Debate that.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)